I appreciate the sentiment of an article to encourage the many benefits of a quiet leader, however I don’t think they are fully explored yet. It does seem that throughout the article there is a tendency to suggest ways of ‘developing’ or ‘strengthening’ that quiet leader as if it still remains a weakness?
Thank you Tim for sharing your thoughts and you are absolutely correct - this is a very detailed topic and my article probably skims still, the surface in a small way. In a world that has been brought up expecting a leader to be someone charismatic, rallies people, is the face of the organization, etc., quiet leaders have been drawing the short straw most times. A lot of work is required in helping such leaders lead with their quiet yet strong leadership competencies and perhaps more for organizations to change the way they have traditionally perceived leadership.
Thanks for sharing your experience and penning your thoughts - extremely helpful
And also The Reluctant King
Thank you for your sharing your thoughts - appreciate it!
I appreciate the sentiment of an article to encourage the many benefits of a quiet leader, however I don’t think they are fully explored yet. It does seem that throughout the article there is a tendency to suggest ways of ‘developing’ or ‘strengthening’ that quiet leader as if it still remains a weakness?
Thank you Tim for sharing your thoughts and you are absolutely correct - this is a very detailed topic and my article probably skims still, the surface in a small way. In a world that has been brought up expecting a leader to be someone charismatic, rallies people, is the face of the organization, etc., quiet leaders have been drawing the short straw most times. A lot of work is required in helping such leaders lead with their quiet yet strong leadership competencies and perhaps more for organizations to change the way they have traditionally perceived leadership.
I look forward to reading more.