The Hidden Strength of Quiet Leaders
Oluwakemi Ogunsina on why your best leaders might be hiding in plain sight
“We don’t need giant personalities to transform companies. We need leaders who build not their own egos but the institutions they run.”
Susan Cain
For decades, leadership research has highlighted the value of authenticity, yet a paradox still defines many executive suites. Organizations celebrate the idea of diverse leadership styles in theory, but in practice, countless introverted professionals feel pressured to disguise who they are. As Oluwakemi Ogunsina describes in her study “Quiet Journeys”, they put on “extrovert masks” to fit into roles still shaped by expectations of charisma, visibility, and constant outward energy.
The cost of this mismatch is mounting.
In an era of hybrid workplaces, heightened mental health awareness, and relentless innovation pressures driven by AI, clinging to extrovert-centric leadership ideals risks silencing a vital resource: leaders whose strength lies in reflection, humility, and depth of thought. By overlooking them, companies may be undercutting the very adaptability and creativity they so desperately need.
Take Pablo Isla, the former CEO of Inditex (parent company of Zara). Far from the archetypal high-profile executive, Isla preferred understated leadership—favoring informal conversations over stage-managed presentations and spotlighting his frontline teams instead of himself. Yet under his quiet direction, Inditex grew into one of Spain’s most valuable companies. His example raises a pressing question:
How many more introverted leaders could deliver extraordinary results if they weren’t forced to perform extroversion?
The Extrovert Ideal: A Corporate Orthodoxy
The corporate preference for extroverted leadership is hardly hidden. From open-plan offices designed for constant collaboration to development programs that prioritize networking and stage presence, the modern workplace reflects what Susan Cain famously called the extrovert ideal—the belief that the strongest leaders must be outgoing, assertive, and ever-comfortable in the spotlight.
But this orthodoxy comes at a cost. Ogunsina’s interviews with twelve successful introverted leaders across multiple industries revealed a troubling pattern: many felt compelled to suppress their natural dispositions, donning “extrovert masks” simply to advance. The toll was more than professional—it was deeply personal.
Zoe, an HR leader in the study, put it plainly: “My company values someone who is expressive, takes charge, and never hesitates to share an opinion. That doesn’t fit me.” Research by Karl Moore echoes this finding: while nearly one-third of top executives identify as introverts, most admit they had to “put on their game faces” and act extroverted to rise. The contradiction raises a hard question:
Are organizations rewarding performance, or performance theater?
The Silence Trap: When Reflection Becomes Liability
Bias against introverts often shows up most visibly in meetings. Extroverted leaders, quick to speak and dominate discussion, are rewarded with attention and influence. Introverted leaders, who prefer to reflect before contributing, risk being misread as disengaged. This has profound implications, especially when we consider the rise of executives coming out of the collectivist cultures in East Asia, Latin America and Africa, all of which put a low value on hyper-individualistic performance, often seeing it as a sign of immaturity.
As one study participant in Ogunsina’s study explained: “Before I’ve finished thinking, the conversation has already moved on.” Another, Barry, described meetings as ego-driven arenas where reflection had little room: “I consider options, but the speed is faster than my process. Sometimes I just don’t get the chance to contribute.”
Researchers call this a “voice behavior” challenge. The irony is painful: organizations urgently need slow, careful thinking in a complex world, yet they penalize the very people equipped to provide it.
The Identity Crisis: Lost Selves in the C-Suite
Perhaps the deepest damage comes not from missed input, but from sustained identity suppression. Ogunsina calls it “negation of identity”: introverted leaders forced to perform extroversion often describe profound disconnection from themselves, leading to anxiety, burnout, and even breakdowns.
Whitney, a board member, recalled: “I thought I had to become an extrovert to survive. Otherwise, you’re not accepted.” She later suffered panic attacks and required therapy to reconnect with her authentic self. Another leader, Sally, heard a friend describe her at work as wearing “armor” so unlike her real self that she seemed unrecognizable.
Psychologists call this incongruence—when one’s outer role diverges sharply from one’s inner identity. The outcomes are predictable: lower well-being, less satisfaction, and ultimately diminished effectiveness.
The Space Invasion: When Networking Never Ends
Leadership roles today often demand constant networking, presence, and availability—an exhausting reality for introverts who recharge in solitude. Ogunsina’s participants described endless meetings, evening events, and an absence of boundaries.
Uma, an HR coach, felt “bombarded” by people and starved for quiet: “It wasn’t the people—it was the amount. There was no limit.” Oscar, a CFO, admitted that weekends alone felt restorative, but leadership made solitude a luxury: “That’s where the challenge is. You have to find balance.”
Even workplace design reinforces the pressure. Open offices, glass walls, and hot desks may promote collaboration, but to introverts, they can feel like surveillance—spaces where there’s nowhere to think, pause, or simply breathe.
The Path Forward: Strategies for Authentic Leadership
Despite these challenges, introverted leaders can and do thrive authentically—especially when they adopt deliberate strategies and receive organizational support. Ogunsina’s research highlights four critical practices:
Self-Awareness and Self-Acceptance – Leaders who embraced their introversion fared better than those who resisted it. As Oscar, a CFO, put it: “If you play to your strengths, you shine—and do it effortlessly.”
Strategic Boundaries – Successful introverts carved out protected time and space, limiting after-hours events and blocking time for quiet reflection. Victor, a deputy CEO, kept Fridays free for this reason.
Purpose-Driven Focus – Many overcame draining tasks by connecting them to meaningful goals. Richard, an HR partner, explained: “You adapt because you’re working toward a purpose.”
Support Networks – Mentors, coaches, and especially fellow introverted leaders helped normalize their experiences. Uma noted: “It’s always helpful to know you’re not alone—because most introverts pretend to be extroverts.”
Organizational Implications: The Innovation Imperative
The business case is clear: organizations that prize personality diversity—not just demographic diversity—outperform others in problem-solving and innovation. Harvard Business Review has even shown that “quiet CEOs” often outperform their more flamboyant peers, focusing on long-term strategy, listening deeply, and empowering teams.
By clinging to extrovert-centric models, companies risk building what Ogunsina calls “monolithic organizations”—leadership cultures too homogeneous to adapt in turbulent times.
Redesigning Leadership for the Future
Forward-thinking organizations are beginning to shift. Redesigning leadership culture means:
Meetings: Use pre-reads, structured turn-taking, and multiple input channels beyond verbal participation.
Workspaces: Balance collaborative zones with quiet rooms for reflection.
Leadership Development: Train with personality diversity in mind, not one-size-fits-all charisma.
Performance Metrics: Reward results and impact, not just visibility or vocality.
The Authenticity Advantage
When introverted leaders can lead as themselves, they bring powerful assets: deep listening, careful decision-making, sensitivity to team dynamics, and the ability to foster psychological safety. Whitney, the board member who rebuilt her authentic leadership, captured it well:
“The strength of an introvert leader is letting things unfold, then offering perspective. Over time, it shifts the group.”
Sean, a CEO, emphasized another gift: “I can read emotions and body language. That gives me an edge at the negotiation table.”
The Cost of Conformity
Forcing introverted leaders to conform to extroverted norms creates risks far beyond personal burnout. Organizations may be:
Silencing valuable perspectives
Making decisions vulnerable to groupthink
Losing top talent who see no path forward
Sacrificing innovation that comes from diverse ways of thinking
A New Leadership Paradigm
The evidence is no longer in question: introverts can lead—and lead exceptionally well. The real question is whether organizations will evolve to harness their full potential. In an era where hybrid work is reshaping norms, presence and volume matter less than outcomes and insight.
For introverted professionals still wearing masks in boardrooms worldwide, the message is clear: authenticity is not just self-fulfilling—it may be the next great competitive advantage in leadership. The quiet revolution has already begun. The challenge now is whether organizations are listening closely enough to hear it.
Oluwakemi Ogunsina has spent decades as a finance professional in the oil & energy industry. She is a graduate of INSEAD’s Executive Master in Consulting and Coaching for Change.
References
Cain, S. (2012). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can't stop talking. Crown.
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
Dib, F. (2014). The silent are golden. Professional Manager, 52-55.
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Transaction Publishers.
Grant, A. M., Gino, F., & Hofmann, D. A. (2010). The hidden advantages of quiet bosses. Harvard Business Review, 88(12), 28.
Hansen, M., Ibarra, H., & Peyer, U. (2013). The best-performing CEOs in the world. Harvard Business Review, 91(1-2), 81-95.
Jung, C. G. (1921). Psychological types. Princeton University Press.
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
McGinn, D. (2017). The best-performing CEOs in the world 2017. Harvard Business Review, 95(6), 66-71.
Ogunsina, O. (2018). Quiet journeys: A phenomenological study exploring the introverts' experience in leadership [Master's thesis, INSEAD].
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: The study of a science, Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social contexts (pp. 184-256). McGraw-Hill.
 | A guest post by
|